So The Question Is, First,

Since We Have Placed Justification In The Revelation Of Jesus Christ Formed And Brought Forth In The Heart, There Working His Works Of Righteousness And Bringing Forth The Fruits Of The Spirit.

Therefore 'christ Hath Tasted Death For Every Man:' Not Only For All Kinds Of Men, As Some Vainly Talk, But For Every One, Of All Kinds; The Benefit Of Whose Offering Is Not Only Extended To Such, Who Have The Distinct Outward Knowledge Of His Death And Sufferings, As The Same Is Declared In The Scriptures, But Even Unto Those Who Are Necessarily Excluded From The Benefit Of This Knowledge By Some Inevitable Accident.

He That Desireth To Acquire Any Art Or Science Seeketh First Those Means By Which That Art Or Science Is Obtained. If We Ought To Do So In Things Natural And Earthly, How Much More Then In Spiritual?

So The Question Is, First, Whether The Civil Magistrate Hath Power To Force Men In Things Religious To Do Contrary To Their Conscience, And If They Will Not To Punish Them In Their Goods, Liberties, Or Lives? This We Hold In The Negative.

According To Which Principle Or Hypothesis All The Objections Against The Universality Of Christ's Death Are Easily Solved; Neither Is It Needful To Recur To The Ministry Of Angels, And Those Other Miraculous Means Which They Say God Useth To Manifest The Doctrine And History Of Christ's Passion Unto Such, Who, Living In The Places Of The World Where The Outward Preaching Of The Gospel Is Unknown, Have Well Improved The First And Common Grace.