What We're Already Doing Is

The Question We Should Be Asking Is Not Why People Are Sometimes Cruel, Or Even Why A Few People Are Usually Cruel (all Evidence Suggests True Sadists Are An Extremely Small Proportion Of The Population Overall), But How We Have Come To Create Institutions That Encourage Such Behavior And That Suggest Cruel People Are In Some Ways Admirable-or At Least As Deserving Of Sympathy As Those They Push Around.

Capitalism Is Like This Fractal Thing Where Anything That Contains An Element Of Capitalism Anywhere Inside It Is Just Something That Turns Into Capitalism. It Is An Incredibly Defeatist Attitude. If You Choose To Look At Reality That Way, I Suppose You Can, But You Have To Do Enormous Violence To Reality To Do So Consistently.

Within A Capitalist Corporation, Someone Says, "lend Me A Wrench," And Someone Asks, "yeah, What Do I Get?" You Assume That The Idea Of Each According To His Or Her Abilities, Each According To His Or Her Needs - In Solving A Problem - Is Actually The Only Thing That Works. And In Situations Of Disaster, There Are Often Communistic Notions Of Improvisation, Where You Basically Exchange Hierarchies And All Of A Sudden All Those Things That Are Luxuries That You Can't Afford, You Have Them In An Emergency.

Anarchism Is Surprisingly Effective In Solving Actual Problems Largely Because Anarchists Have Thought A Lot About Solving Actual Problems On A Micro Level In Ways That Other Political Ideologies Don't Really Feel They Have To Until After They Seize State Power.

Neoliberalism Isn't An Economic Program - It's A Political Program Designed To Produce Hopelessness And Kill Any Future Alternatives.