To The End Of History,

Toleration Of People Who Differ In Convictions And Habits Requires A Residual Awareness Of The Complexity Of Truth And The Possibility Of Opposing View Having Some Light On One Or The Other Facet Of A Many-sided Truth.

A Republic Properly Understood Is A Sovereignty Of Justice, In Contradistinction To A Sovereignty Of Will.

We Have Previously Suggested That Philanthropy Combines Genuine Pity With The Display Of Power And That The Latter Element Explains Why The Powerful Are More Inclined To Be Generous Than To Grant Social Justice.

In The 17th And 18th Centuries There Was A Kind Of Protestantism That Said, "if You Could Only Get Rid Of The Bishop, Then You'd Be A True Christian".

A Church Has The Right To Set Its Own Standards Within Its Community. I Don't Think It Has A Right To Prohibit Birth Control Or To Enforce Upon A Secular Society Its Conception Of Divorce And The Indissolubility Of The Marriage Tie.