There's No Evidence That I'm

Yes, Believers And Non-believers And Skeptics Can All Live Together And Get Along. But There Cannot Be An Imperialistic Imposition Of Religion By The State Or By The Church. All People Must Be Equal--believers, Skeptics, Disbelievers, Atheists, And Those Who Chose Religion. Unless We Are All Deemed Equal, And Unless The Morality Of Disbelief Is Deemed The Equivalent Of The Morality Of Belief, We Will Simply Be Tolerated, And That Is Not The American Way.

I Have Always Considered "pascal's Wager" A Questionable Bet To Place. Any God Worth "believing In" Would Surely Prefer An Honest Agnostic To A Calculating Hypocrite.

On Television And In The Movies, Crimes Are Always Solved. Nothing Is Left Uncertain. By The End, The Viewer Knows Whodunit. In Real Life, On The Other Hand, Many Murders Remain Unsolved, And Even Some That Are "solved" To The Satisfaction Of The Police And Prosecutors Lack Sufficient Evidence To Result In A Conviction.

When The Jews Were Being Persecuted By The Nazis In 1944 We Passed The War Refugee Act, Which Focused On Rescuing Jews, A Religious Group. But If The Religious Group Is The Subject Of The Persecution Based On Their Religion, It's Perfectly Ok For A First Amendment-bound Society To Emphasize Their Rescue, Just As It Is Perfectly Ok To Emphasize The Fact That Many, If Not All Of The Perpetrators Of Islamic Terrorism, Come From Countries With A History Of Supporting Terrorism.

It's Every Lawyer's Dream To Help Shape The Law, Not Just React To It.