The Only Dynasty I Like

Activist Supreme Courts Are Not New. The Dred Scott Decision In 1856, Imposing Slavery In Free Territories; The Plessy Decision In 1896, Imposing Segregation On A Private Railroad Company; The Korematsu Decision In 1944, Upholding Franklin Roosevelt’s Internment Of American Citizens, Mostly Japanese Americans; And The Roe Decision In 1973, Imposing Abortion On The Entire Nation; Are Examples Of The Consequences Of Activist Courts And Justices.

Class Warfare Or Soaking The So-called Rich May Make For Good Populist Demagoguery And Serve The Political Ends Of The Governing Masterminds, But It Does Nothing To Solve The Grave Realities Of The Federal Government's Insatiable Appetite For Spending And Its Inability To Reform Itself.

The Conservative Does Not Despise Government. He Despises Tyranny. This Is Precisely Why The Conservative Reveres The Constitution And Insists On Adherence To It.

To Be True To Its Constitutional Role, The Supreme Court Should Refuse To Be Drawn Into Making Public Policy, And It Should Strike Down Legislation Only When A Clear Constitutional Violation Exists. When Judicial Activists Resort To Various Inventions And Theories To Impose Their Personal Views On Privacy And Liberty, They Jeopardize The Legitimacy Of The Judiciary As An Institution And Undermine The Role Of The Other Branches Of Government.

We Now Have The Liberal Playbook And We Know What They Are Doing, And We Are Using It Against Them. Unlike The Democrats Though, We Aren't Out To Destroy Our Society, We Are Out To Save It.