The Average, Vague Understanding Of

I See The Situation Of Man In The World Of Planetary Technicity Not As An Inexitricable And Inescapable Destiny, But I See The Task Of Thought Precisely In This, That Within Its Own Limits It Helps Man As Such Achieve A Satisfactory Relationship To The Essence Of Technicity. National Socialism Did Indeed Go In This Direction. Those People, However, Were Far Too Poorly Equipped For Thought To Arrive At A Really Explicit Relationship To What Is Happening Today And Has Been Underway For The Past 300 Years.

Since Time Itself Is Not Movement, It Must Somehow Have To Do With Movement.time Is Initially Encountered In Those Entities Which Are Changeable, Change Is In Time. How Is Time Exhibited In This Way Of Encountering It, Namely, As That Within Which Things Change? Does It Here Give Itself As Itself In What It Is? Can An Axplacation Of Time Starts Here Guarantee That Time Will Thereby Provide As It Were The Fundamental Phenomena That Determine It In Its Own Being?

Being And Time Determine Each Other Reciprocally, But In Such A Manner That Neither Can The Former - Being - Be Addressed As Something Temporal Nor Can The Latter - Time - Be Addressed As A Being.

Only Where Leader And Led Together Bind Each Other In One Destiny ... Does True Order Grow.

Thus "phenomenology" Means αποφαινεσθαι τα φαινομενα -- To Let That Which Shows Itself Be Seen From Itself In The Very Way In Which It Shows Itself From Itself.