Only A Few Know, How

A Consistent Pursuit Of Classical Physics Forces A Transformation In The Very Heart Of That Physics.

It Is Probably True Quite Generally That In The History Of Human Thinking The Most Fruitful Developments Frequently Take Place At Those Points Where Two Different Lines Of Thought Meet. These Lines May Have Their Roots In Quite Different Parts Of Human Nature, In Different Times Or Different Cultural Environments Or Different Religious Traditions: Hence If They Actually Meet, That Is, If They Are At Least So Much Related To Each Other That A Real Interaction Can Take Place, Then One May Hope That New And Interesting Developments May Follow.

Therefore, The Two Processes, That Of Science And That Of Art, Are Not Very Different. Both Science And Art Form In The Course Of The Centuries A Human Language By Which We Can Speak About The More Remote Parts Of Reality, And The Coherent Sets Of Concepts As Well As The Different Styles Of Art Are Different Words Or Groups Of Words In This Language.

Many People Will Tell You That An Expert Is Someone Who Knows A Great Deal About The Subject. To This I Would Object That One Can Never Know Much About Any Subject. I Would Much Prefer The Following Definition: An Expert Is Someone Who Knows Some Of The Worst Mistakes That Can Be Made In The Subject, And How To Avoid Them.

...separation Of The Observer From The Phenomenon To Be Observed Is No Longer Possible.