Monetary Expansion Is A Massive

Once One Concedes That A Single World Government Is Not Necessary, Then Where Does One Logically Stop At The Permissibility Of Separate States? If Canada And The United States Can Be Separate Nations Without Being Denounced As In A State Of Impermissible ‘anarchy’, Why May Not The South Secede From The United States? New York State From The Union? New York City From The State? Why May Not Manhattan Secede? Each Neighbourhood? Each Block? Each House? Each Person?

Money Is Different From All Other Commodities: Other Things Being Equal, More Shoes, Or More Discoveries Of Oil Or Copper Benefit Society, Since They Help Alleviate Natural Scarcity. But Once A Commodity Is Established As A Money On The Market, No More Money At All Is Needed. Since The Only Use Of Money Is For Exchange And Reckoning, More Dollars Or Pounds Or Marks In Circulation Cannot Confer A Social Benefit: They Will Simply Dilute The Exchange Value Of Every Existing Dollar Or Pound Or Mark.

Capitalism Is The Fullest Expression Of Anarchism, And Anarchism Is The Fullest Expression Of Capitalism. Not Only Are They Compatible, But You Can't Really Have One Without The Other. True Anarchism Will Be Capitalism, And True Capitalism Will Be Anarchism

The Natural Tendency Of The State Is Inflation. This Statement Will Shock Those Accustomed To Viewing The State As A Committee Of The Whole Nation Ardently Dispensing The General Welfare, But I Think It Nonetheless True.

If You Wish To Know How Libertarians Regard The State And Any Of Its Acts, Simply Think Of The State As A Criminal Band, And All Of The Libertarian Attitudes Will Logically Fall Into Place.