In A Constitutional Democracy The

The First Amendment Is About How We Govern Ourselves - Not About How We Titillate Ourselves Sexually.

[the Current Governing Judicial Philosophy Is:] If You Want Something Passionately Enough, It Is Guaranteed By The Constitution. No Need To Fiddle Around Gathering Votes From Recalcitrant Citizens.

The Notion That Congress Can Change The Meaning Given A Constitutional Provision By The Court Is Subversive Of The Function Of Judicial Review; And It Is Not The Less So Because The Court Promises To Allow It Only When The Constitution Is Moved To The Left.

The National Rifle Association Is Always Arguing That The Second Amendment Determines The Right To Bear Arms. But I Think It Really Is The People's Right To Bear Arms In A Militia. The Nra Thinks It Protects Their Right To Have Teflon-coated Bullets. But That's Not The Original Understanding.

Those Who Made And Endorsed Our Constitution Knew Man's Nature, And It Is To Their Ideas, Rather Than To The Temptations Of Utopia, That We Must Ask That Our Judges Adhere.