In A Constitutional Democracy The

There Is No Single Grand Strategy. Just As The New Left Abandoned An Overarching Program And Became A Series Of Like-minded Groups Advancing Area By Area, So It Must Counterattacked Area By Area.

Conservatives . . . May Decide To Join The Game And Seek Activist Judges With Conservative Views. Should That Come To Pass, Those Who Have Tempted The Courts To Political Judging Will Have Gained Nothing For Themselves But Will Have Destroyed A Great And Essential Institution. . . . There Are Only Two Sides. Either The Constitution And Statutes Are Law, Which Means Their Principles Are Known And Control Judges, Or They Are Malleable Texts That Judges May Rewrite To See That Particular Groups Or Political Causes Win.

There Can Be No Doubt That The Systematic Hostility Of The Courts To Religion Has Lowered The Prestige Of Religion In The Public Mind.

I Don't Think The Constitution Is Studied Almost Anywhere, Including Law Schools. In Law Schools, What They Study Is What The Court Said About The Constitution. They Study The Opinions. They Don't Study The Constitution Itself.

The Judge's Authority Derives Entirely From The Fact That He Is Applying The Law And Not His Personal Values. That Is Why The American Public Accepts The Decisions Of Its Courts, Accepts Even Decisions That Nullify The Laws A Majority Of The Electorate Or Their Representatives Voted For.