I'm Concerned About The Survival,

Different Political Views, Even If They're All Liberal, In The Sense Of Supporting Liberal Constitutional Democracy, Undoubtedly Have Some Notion Of The Common Good In The Form Of The Means Provided To Assure That People Can Make Use Of Their Liberties, And The Like.

Now The Good Of Political Life Is A Great Political Good. It Is Not A Secular Good Specified By A Comprehensive Doctrine Like Those Of Kant Or Mill. You Could Characterize This Political Good As The Good Of Free And Equal Citizens Recognizing The Duty Of Civility To One Another: The Duty To Give Citizens Public Reasons For One's Political Actions.

Clearly When The Liberties Are Left Unrestricted They Collide With One Another.

The Fault Of The Utilitarian Doctrine Is That It Mistakes Impersonality For Impartiality.

Thus I Assume That To Each According To His Threat Advantage Is Not A Conception Of Justice.