I Think The Decision That's

The Days Of Looking The Other Way While Despotic Regimes Trample Human Rights, Rob Their Nations' Wealth, And Then Excuse Their Failings By Feeding Their People A Steady Diet Of Anti-western Hatred Are Over.

I Have Argued In The Past, And Would Again, If We Had Been Able To Pre-empt The Attacks Of 9/11 Would We Have Done It? And I Think Absolutely. We Have To Be Prepared Now To Take The Kind Of Bold Action That's Being Contemplated With Respect To Iraq In Order To Ensure That We Don't Get Hit With A Devastating Attack When The Terrorists' Organization Gets Married Up With A Rogue State That's Willing To Provide It With The Kinds Of Deadly Capabilities That Saddam Hussein Has Developed And Used Over The Years.

Had The Decision Belonged To Senator Kerry, Saddam Hussein Would Still Be In Power Today In Iraq. In Fact, Saddam Hussein Would Almost Certainly Still Be In Control Of Kuwait.

I Think The Record Speaks For Itself. These Are Two Individuals Who Have Been For The War When The Headlines Were Good And Against It When Their Poll Ratings Were Bad.

A Little Tough Talk In The Midst Of A Campaign Or As Part Of A Presidential Debate Cannot Obscure A Record Of 30 Years Of Being On The Wrong Side Of Defense Issues.