I Am Against The Whole

Clearly, The First Task Is To Gain Acceptance Of A More Reasonable View Of The Future, One That Opens Possibilities Rather Than Forecloses Them.

For If Enough People Were Really Convinced That Growth Should Be Halted, And If They Acted On That Conviction, Then Billions Of Others Might Be Deprived Of Any Realistic Hope Of Gaining The Opportunities Now Enjoyed By The More Fortunate.

Nuclear War Is Such An Emotional Subject That Many People See The Weapons Themselves As The Common Enemy Of Humanity.

My Guess Is That Nuclear Weapons Will Be Used Sometime In The Next Hundred Years, But That Their Use Is Much More Likely To Be Small And Limited Than Widespread And Unconstrained.

Anything That Reduces War-related Destruction Should Not Be Considered Altogether Immoral.