Certainly One Cannot Ban Cross

Scalia Said The Court Had Pretty Much Signed On To The So-called Homosexual Agenda, Adding: Let Me Be Clear That I Have Nothing Against Homosexuals, Or Any Other Group, Promoting Their Agenda Through Normal Democratic Means.

We Should Start Calling This Law Scotuscare ... [t]his Court's Two Decisions On The Act Will Surely Be Remembered Through The Years ... And The Cases Will Publish Forever The Discouraging Truth That The Supreme Court Of The United States Favors Some Laws Over Others, And Is Prepared To Do Whatever It Takes To Uphold And Assist Its Favorites.

The Court's Job Is To Uphold The Constitution And You Don't Call That Off In Times Of Crisis. Would The Framers Have Allowed This Practice?

Having Had The Good Fortune To Serve Beside Her On Both Courts, I Can Attest That Her Opinions Are Always Thoroughly Considered, Always Carefully Crafted And Almost Always Correct (which Is To Say We Sometimes Disagree). That Much Is Apparent For All To See. What Only Her Colleagues Know Is That Her Suggestions Improve The Opinions The Rest Of Us Write, And That She Is A Source Of Collegiality And Good Judgment In All Our Work.

Ever So Subtly, Without Even Alluding To The Last Obstacles Preserved By Earlier Opinions That We Now Push Out Of Our Path, We Effectively Replace The Goal Of A Discrimination-free Society With The Quite Imcompatible Goal Of Proportionate Representation By Race And By Sex In The Workplace.