A Law Can Be Both

Who Ever Thought That Intimacy And Spirituality [whatever That Means] Were Freedoms? And If Intimacy Is, One Would Think Freedom Of Intimacy Is Abridged Rather Than Expanded By Marriage. Ask The Nearest Hippie.

It Is A Constitution That Morphs While You Look At It Like Plasticman.... That Is Contrary To Our Whole Tradition, To In God We Trust On The Coins, To Thanksgiving Proclamations, To (congressional) Chaplains, To Tax Exemption For Places Of Worship, Which Has Always Existed In America.

I Think The Main Fight Is To Dissuade Americans From What The Secularists Are Trying To Persuade Them To Be True: That The Separation Of Church And State Means That The Government Cannot Favor Religion Over Nonreligion.

The Court's Decision Reflects The Philosophy That Judges Should Endure Whatever Interpretive Distortions It Takes In Order To Correct A Supposed Flaw In The Statutory Machinery. That Philosophy Ignores The American People's Decision To Give Congress '[a]ll Legislative Powers' Enumerated In The Constitution. They Made Congress, Not This Court, Responsible For Both Making Laws And Mending Them.

It's A Long, Uphill Fight To Get Back To Original Orthodoxy. We Have Two 'originalists' On The Supreme Court. That's Something.